Wildlife - Wild Turkeys

2015 Wild Turkey Summer Survey

Wild Turkey Reproduction Remains Low This Summer

Annually since the early 1980's, the S.C. Department of Natural Resources (DNR) conducts a Summer Turkey Survey to estimate reproduction and recruitment of wild turkeys in South Carolina. The survey involves agency wildlife biologists, technicians and conservation officers, as well as many volunteers from other natural resource agencies and the general public.

Although wild turkeys nest primarily in April and May in South Carolina, the survey does not take place until late summer, according to Charles Ruth, DNR Deer and Wild Turkey Program coordinator. Therefore, the survey statistics document poults (young turkeys) that actually survived and entered the fall population.

"Reproduction in turkeys has generally been low for the last decade", said Ruth. "This year, average brood size of 3.6 poults remained good, but the total recruitment ratio of 1.5 was low continuing a less than desirable trend. This low figure was driven by a high percentage of hens (59%) that had no poults at all by late summer. Recruitment ratio has averaged 1.7 over the last 5 years, keep in mind that 2.0 is somewhat of a break even mark. In fact, when turkey populations were expanding during the 1980's recruitment ratio averaged 3.5. Recruitment ratio is a measure of young entering the population based on the number of hens in the population. "At the regional level it appears that reproduction was poor in most of the state."

Unlike deer, wild turkeys are much more susceptible to significant fluctuations in reproduction and recruitment. Lack of reproductive success is often associated with bad weather (cold and wet) during nesting and brood rearing season. However, there are a host of predators that take advantage of turkey nests and broods including; raccoons, opossums, snakes, foxes, bobcats, and numerous avian predators. Coyotes which are not native but are now well established in the state can be added to the list of turkey predators. Turkeys naturally have high reproductive potential and are therefore able to maintain populations in spite of predation and other mortality factors. The problem is that we have not been getting much "bounce back" amid years of poor recruitment.

What does poor reproduction last summer mean for the spring turkey hunter? Ruth indicated, "spring harvest trends have followed trends in reproduction for many years. For example, the harvest in 2015 was down significantly which was not a surprise because reproduction in 2013 was the lowest on record. Two year old gobblers comprise most of the harvest because they are typically more abundant and more responsive to hunters' calls than older more dominant gobblers and there simply were not good numbers of two year old birds last season. On the other hand, the percentage of jakes (juvenile males) harvested in 2015 was substantially higher which is typical when 2 year old birds are not abundant. Finally, the gobbler to hen ratio during last summer's survey was 0.5 which is the lowest since the year 2000, said Ruth. Low gobbler to hen ratios can affect the quality of hunting because hens are extremely available which affects gobbling and responsiveness to calling by hunters."

"The bottom line," Ruth said, "is the state's turkey population is about 35 percent below record levels of around the turn of the century. We need better reproduction for several years to get the population back up. That is the nice thing about turkeys though; given the right conditions they can naturally bounce back in a short period of time."

Anyone interested in participating in the annual Summer Turkey Survey is encouraged to sign-up. The survey period is July 1-August 29 annually and those who participate typically spend a reasonable amount of time outdoors during that time period. Cooperators obviously must be able to identify wild turkeys and must be comfortable in telling the difference between hens, poults, and gobblers. If you would like to participate in the survey, send your name and address to Summer Turkey Survey, P.O. Box 167, Columbia, SC 29202. You will be added to the cooperator list and receive materials at the end of June annually. Those interested in the survey can also download instructions and survey forms at the following website: https://www.dnr.sc.gov/wildlife/turkey/volunbroodsurvey.html

Figure 1. Map of physiographic regions for 2015 Summer Turkey Survey

Map of physiographic regions for 2015 Summer Turkey Survey.

Table 1.  Summary of reproductive data for 2015 Summer Turkey Survey by region.

Region Gobbler Hen Ratio No. Hens w/Poults No. Hens w/o Poults (%) No. Poults Avg. Brood Size Total Recruitment Ratio
Piedmont 0.37 496 606 (55) 1,720 3.5 1.6
Midlands 0.85 77 161 (68) 314 4.1 1.3
Northern Coastal 0.44 142 348 (71) 533 3.8 1.1
Southern Coastal 0.60 362 428 (54) 1,262 3.5 1.6
Statewide 0.49 1,077 1,543 (59) 3,829 3.6 1.5

Table 2. Statewide Summer Turkey Survey reproductive data 2011-2015.

Year Gobbler Hen Ratio No. Hens w/Poults No. Hens w/o Poults (%) No. Poults Avg. Brood Size Total Recruitment Ratio
2011 0.76 1,442 1,223 (46) 5,987 4.2 2.3
2012 0.78 1,208 1,472 (55) 5,085 4.2 1.9
2013 0.70 810 1,588 (66) 3.169 3.9 1.3
2014 0.60 983 1,403 (59) 3,834 3.8 1.6
2015 0.49 1,077 1,543 (59) 3,829 3.6 1.5
Average 0.67 1,104 1,446 (57) 4,381 4.0 1.7

Table 3. 2015 Summer Turkey Survey Results by County

County No. Observ. No. Poults No. Hens w/ Poults No. Hens w/o Poults No. Hens % Hens w/o Poults No. Gobblers No. Unid. Total Turkeys Observed
Abbeville 21 16 6 22 28 79 13 13 70
Aiken 43 51 16 29 45 64 54 3 153
Allendale 30 23 14 28 42 67 53 31 149
Anderson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bamberg 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 3
Barnwell 58 38 12 45 57 79 9 0 104
Beaufort 50 250 77 54 131 41 4 9 394
Berkeley 91 230 72 68 140 49 95 36 501
Calhoun 3 5 1 2 3 67 3 0 11
Charleston 53 149 47 55 102 54 55 15 321
Cherokee 3 22 6 2 8 25 0 0 30
Chester 51 170 51 42 93 45 30 20 313
Chesterfield 21 90 18 17 35 49 5 9 139
Clarendon 13 14 4 7 11 64 12 7 44
Colleton 29 138 43 46 89 52 69 0 296
Darlington 14 34 11 25 36 69 50 0 120
Dillon 9 19 7 11 18 61 15 3 55
Dorchester 8 9 3 8 11 73 17 1 38
Edgefield 14 38 17 29 46 63 3 0 87
Fairfield 77 270 77 100 177 56 56 39 542
Florence 52 128 35 98 133 74 89 42 392
Georgetown 44 118 35 76 111 68 13 13 255
Greenville 3 8 2 2 4 50 5 8 25
Greenwood 33 28 18 44 62 71 17 0 107
Hampton 104 356 75 77 152 51 144 39 691
Horry 10 19 7 9 16 56 7 14 56
Jasper 4 1 3 16 19 84 1 0 21
Kershaw 6 5 1 3 4 75 5 0 14
Lancaster 11 44 9 6 15 40 6 0 65
Laurens 16 33 8 14 22 64 1 12 68
Lee 2 6 2 6 8 75 3 0 17
Lexington 6 13 3 5 8 63 2 0 23
McCormick 33 86 33 30 63 48 2 5 156
Marion 32 50 17 51 68 75 24 1 143
Marlboro 5 0 0 3 3 100 11 5 19
Newberry 52 157 36 44 80 55 83 7 327
Oconee 13 31 8 3 11 27 4 10 56
Orangeburg 22 66 15 31 46 67 25 18 155
Pickens 45 126 34 37 71 52 37 1 235
Richland 31 92 22 22 44 50 38 0 174
Saluda 12 30 8 20 28 71 9 0 67
Spartanburg 35 98 24 43 67 64 24 0 189
Sumter 29 18 3 49 52 94 32 0 102
Union 147 506 144 150 294 51 95 43 938
Williamsburg 74 185 37 96 133 72 56 57 431
York 30 57 15 18 33 55 18 22 130
State Total 1,440 3,829 1,077 1,543 2,620 59 1,294 483 8,226

The 2015 Summer Turkey Brood Survey above is provided in Adobe® Acrobat® (PDF) format. Adobe® Reader® is required to open this file and is available as a free download from the Adobe® Web site.
Get Adobe Reader